Financial-condition comparison

FCB Banks vs Lakeside Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

FCB Banks

Collinsville, IL

B

Health score

80.8

Total assets

$2.6B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Lakeside Bank

Chicago, IL

A

Health score

88.4

Total assets

$2.9B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Lakeside Bank leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability and lending quality and growth. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Lakeside Bank

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Lakeside Bank

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Lakeside Bank

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Lakeside Bank

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Lakeside Bank

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricFCB BanksLakeside Bank
TFS health score80.8/10088.4/100Leads
Total assets$2.6B$2.9B
Total deposits / shares$2.3B$2.5B
Tier 1 capital ratio8.45%10.99%Leads
Return on assets1.79%1.81%Leads
Return on equity21.98%Leads17.28%
Non-performing loans0.76%0.03%Leads
Net charge-offs0.01%-0.02%Leads
Efficiency ratio50.98%Leads52.84%
Loan-to-deposit ratio89.36%93.44%
Asset growth (YoY)1.61%5.88%Leads
Deposit / share growth (YoY)5.54%8.75%Leads
Branches2011
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

FCB Banks

20 branches

Lakeside Bank

11 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: IL.

CFPB complaint coverage

FCB Banks

Unavailable

Lakeside Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

FCB Banks

0 in TFS registry

Lakeside Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterFCB Banks scoreFCB Banks ROALakeside Bank scoreLakeside Bank ROA
2024-Q3—1.10%—1.19%
2024-Q4—1.15%—1.25%
2025-Q1—1.43%—1.43%
2025-Q2—1.49%—1.51%
2025-Q3—1.58%—1.57%
2025-Q4—1.62%—1.64%
2026-Q181.7/1001.74%87.3/1001.65%
2026-Q280.8/1001.79%88.4/1001.81%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

FCB Banks
Lakeside Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare FCB Banks with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.