This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Bank
Collinsville, IL
Health score
80.8
Total assets
$2.6B
Bank
Oak Brook, IL
Health score
81.4
Total assets
$2.6B
Answer first
FCB Banks leads on profitability and lending quality and growth; Republic Bank of Chicago leads on financial health and capitalization. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Financial health
Republic Bank of Chicago
Higher TFS health score
Capitalization
Republic Bank of Chicago
Higher comparable capital ratio
Profitability
FCB Banks
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
FCB Banks
Lower problem-loan measure
Growth
FCB Banks
Higher year-over-year asset growth
Same-source detail
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | FCB Banks | Republic Bank of Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 80.8/100 | 81.4/100Leads |
| Total assets | $2.6B | $2.6B |
| Total deposits / shares | $2.3B | $2.3B |
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 8.45% | 12.57%Leads |
| Return on assets | 1.79%Leads | 1.36% |
| Return on equity | 21.98%Leads |
FCB Banks
20 branches
Republic Bank of Chicago
20 branches
Both institutions report branches in 1 state: IL.
FCB Banks
Unavailable
Republic Bank of Chicago
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
FCB Banks
0 in TFS registry
Republic Bank of Chicago
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
| Quarter | FCB Banks score | FCB Banks ROA | Republic Bank of Chicago score | Republic Bank of Chicago ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-Q3 | — | 1.10% | — | 1.00% |
| 2024-Q4 | — | 1.15% | — | 1.05% |
| 2025-Q1 | — | 1.43% | — | 1.07% |
| 2025-Q2 | — | 1.49% | — | 1.24% |
| 2025-Q3 | — | 1.58% | — | 1.30% |
| 2025-Q4 | — | 1.62% | — | 1.27% |
| 2026-Q1 | 81.7/100 | 1.74% |
Keep watching
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
Related comparisons
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Arbitrary comparison pairs are available dynamically but remain noindex unless curated for data completeness and user value.
| 10.73% |
| Non-performing loans | 0.76%Leads | 1.27% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01%Leads | 0.02% |
| Efficiency ratio | 50.98%Leads | 61.54% |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 89.36% | 73.21% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | 1.61%Leads | -1.26% |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | 5.54%Leads | 0.33% |
| Branches | 20 | 20 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |
| 80.7/100 |
| 1.51% |
| 2026-Q2 | 80.8/100 | 1.79% | 81.4/100 | 1.36% |