This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Bank
Muenster, TX
Health score
83.7
Total assets
$227.0M
Answer first
Muenster State Bank leads on profitability and lending quality; Sanger Bank leads on financial health and capitalization and growth. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Financial health
Sanger Bank
Higher TFS health score
Capitalization
Sanger Bank
Higher comparable capital ratio
Profitability
Muenster State Bank
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
Muenster State Bank
Lower problem-loan measure
Growth
Sanger Bank
Higher year-over-year asset growth
Same-source detail
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | Muenster State Bank | Sanger Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 83.7/100 | 85.6/100Leads |
| Total assets | $227.0M | $224.4M |
| Total deposits / shares | $192.3M | $186.6M |
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 14.78% | 16.53%Leads |
| Return on assets | 2.36%Leads | 1.13% |
| Return on equity | 19.96%Leads |
Muenster State Bank
2 branches
Sanger Bank
2 branches
Both institutions report branches in 1 state: TX.
Muenster State Bank
Unavailable
Sanger Bank
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
Muenster State Bank
0 in TFS registry
Sanger Bank
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Muenster State Bank score | Muenster State Bank ROA | Sanger Bank score | Sanger Bank ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-Q3 | — | 2.01% | — | 1.14% |
| 2024-Q4 | — | 1.74% | — | 1.29% |
| 2025-Q1 | — | 2.28% | — | 1.51% |
| 2025-Q2 | — | 2.19% | — | 1.60% |
| 2025-Q3 | — | 2.25% | — | 1.52% |
| 2025-Q4 | — | 1.94% | — | 1.27% |
| 2026-Q1 | 83.3/100 | 2.35% |
Keep watching
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
Related comparisons
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Arbitrary comparison pairs are available dynamically but remain noindex unless curated for data completeness and user value.
| 7.02% |
| Non-performing loans | 0.00%Leads | 0.51% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Efficiency ratio | 36.42%Leads | 64.04% |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 42.51% | 66.02% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | 1.77% | 6.03%Leads |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | 2.99% | 6.17%Leads |
| Branches | 2 | 2 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |
| 88.2/100 |
| 1.21% |
| 2026-Q2 | 83.7/100 | 2.36% | 85.6/100 | 1.13% |