This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Bank
Bloomington, IL
Health score
80.2
Total assets
$6.7B
Bank
Aurora, IL
Health score
87.4
Total assets
$6.9B
Answer first
Heartland Bank and Trust Company leads on lending quality and growth; Old Second National Bank leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Financial health
Old Second National Bank
Higher TFS health score
Capitalization
Old Second National Bank
Higher comparable capital ratio
Profitability
Old Second National Bank
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
Heartland Bank and Trust Company
Lower problem-loan measure
Growth
Heartland Bank and Trust Company
Higher year-over-year asset growth
Same-source detail
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | Heartland Bank and Trust Company | Old Second National Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 80.2/100 | 87.4/100Leads |
| Total assets | $6.7B | $6.9B |
| Total deposits / shares | $5.8B | $5.5B |
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 11.94% | 12.05%Leads |
| Return on assets | 1.43% | 1.69%Leads |
| Return on equity | 11.16% | 12.59% |
Heartland Bank and Trust Company
88 branches
Old Second National Bank
59 branches
Both institutions report branches in 1 state: IL.
Heartland Bank and Trust Company
Unavailable
Old Second National Bank
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
Heartland Bank and Trust Company
0 in TFS registry
Old Second National Bank
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Heartland Bank and Trust Company score | Heartland Bank and Trust Company ROA | Old Second National Bank score | Old Second National Bank ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-Q3 | — | 1.50% | — | 1.68% |
| 2024-Q4 | — | 1.57% | — | 1.63% |
| 2025-Q1 | — | 1.62% | — | 1.54% |
| 2025-Q2 | — | 1.65% | — | 1.61% |
| 2025-Q3 | — | 1.68% | — | 1.32% |
| 2025-Q4 | — | 1.67% | — | 1.46% |
| 2026-Q1 | 75.8/100 |
Keep watching
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
Related comparisons
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Arbitrary comparison pairs are available dynamically but remain noindex unless curated for data completeness and user value.
| Non-performing loans | 0.19%Leads | 1.08% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.03%Leads | 0.73% |
| Efficiency ratio | 58.17% | 49.49%Leads |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 81.25% | 94.71% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | 34.01%Leads | 20.39% |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | 33.10%Leads | 12.28% |
| Branches | 88 | 59 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |
| 1.08% |
| 86.6/100 |
| 1.61% |
| 2026-Q2 | 80.2/100 | 1.43% | 87.4/100 | 1.69% |