Financial-condition comparison

Citizens Community Bank vs Vidalia Federal Savings Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Citizens Community Bank

Hahira, GA

B

Health score

80.1

Total assets

$221.9M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Vidalia Federal Savings Bank

Vidalia, GA

D+

Health score

58.5

Total assets

$212.0M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Citizens Community Bank leads on financial health and profitability and growth; Vidalia Federal Savings Bank leads on capitalization and lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Citizens Community Bank

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Vidalia Federal Savings Bank

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Citizens Community Bank

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Vidalia Federal Savings Bank

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Citizens Community Bank

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricCitizens Community BankVidalia Federal Savings Bank
TFS health score80.1/100Leads58.5/100
Total assets$221.9M$212.0M
Total deposits / shares$200.0M$164.3M
Tier 1 capital ratio8.94%12.05%Leads
Return on assets1.45%Leads-0.80%
Return on equity22.03%Leads-6.72%
Non-performing loans0.89%0.79%Leads
Net charge-offs0.08%0.00%Leads
Efficiency ratio64.49%Leads155.70%
Loan-to-deposit ratio67.43%59.08%
Asset growth (YoY)8.94%Leads-5.50%
Deposit / share growth (YoY)7.27%Leads-3.79%
Branches42
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Citizens Community Bank

4 branches

Vidalia Federal Savings Bank

2 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: GA.

CFPB complaint coverage

Citizens Community Bank

Unavailable

Vidalia Federal Savings Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Citizens Community Bank

0 in TFS registry

Vidalia Federal Savings Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterCitizens Community Bank scoreCitizens Community Bank ROAVidalia Federal Savings Bank scoreVidalia Federal Savings Bank ROA
2024-Q3—1.10%—-1.10%
2024-Q4—1.11%—-0.82%
2025-Q1—0.87%—-0.85%
2025-Q2—1.12%—-0.87%
2025-Q3—1.26%—-0.78%
2025-Q4—1.32%—-0.61%
2026-Q181.1/1001.56%56.8/100-0.73%
2026-Q280.1/1001.45%58.5/100-0.80%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Citizens Community Bank
Vidalia Federal Savings Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Citizens Community Bank with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.