This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Bank
Buffalo, WY
Health score
83.2
Total assets
$202.6M
Bank
Lander, WY
Health score
86.0
Total assets
$202.5M
Answer first
Buffalo Federal Bank leads on capitalization and growth; Central Bank and Trust leads on financial health and profitability and lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Financial health
Central Bank and Trust
Higher TFS health score
Capitalization
Buffalo Federal Bank
Higher comparable capital ratio
Profitability
Central Bank and Trust
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
Central Bank and Trust
Lower problem-loan measure
Growth
Buffalo Federal Bank
Higher year-over-year asset growth
Same-source detail
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | Buffalo Federal Bank | Central Bank and Trust |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 83.2/100 | 86.0/100Leads |
| Total assets | $202.6M | $202.5M |
| Total deposits / shares | $175.9M | $182.3M |
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 10.38%Leads | 8.56% |
| Return on assets | 1.31% | 2.19%Leads |
| Return on equity | 15.28% | 26.08% |
Buffalo Federal Bank
3 branches
Central Bank and Trust
5 branches
Both institutions report branches in 1 state: WY.
Buffalo Federal Bank
Unavailable
Central Bank and Trust
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
Buffalo Federal Bank
0 in TFS registry
Central Bank and Trust
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Buffalo Federal Bank score | Buffalo Federal Bank ROA | Central Bank and Trust score | Central Bank and Trust ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-Q3 | — | 0.91% | — | 1.27% |
| 2024-Q4 | — | 0.94% | — | 2.00% |
| 2025-Q1 | — | 0.79% | — | 1.71% |
| 2025-Q2 | — | 0.90% | — | 1.81% |
| 2025-Q3 | — | 1.01% | — | 1.79% |
| 2025-Q4 | — | 1.06% | — | 1.65% |
| 2026-Q1 | 82.9/100 |
Keep watching
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
Related comparisons
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Arbitrary comparison pairs are available dynamically but remain noindex unless curated for data completeness and user value.
| Non-performing loans | 0.67% | 0.00%Leads |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00%Leads | 0.02% |
| Efficiency ratio | 64.83% | 52.55%Leads |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 85.59% | 60.86% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | 3.49%Leads | 2.31% |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | 3.47% | 4.27%Leads |
| Branches | 3 | 5 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |
| 1.33% |
| 81.9/100 |
| 2.03% |
| 2026-Q2 | 83.2/100 | 1.31% | 86.0/100 | 2.19% |