This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Credit union
CHEEKTOWAGA, NY
Health score
75.3
Total assets
$38.1M
Credit union
UTICA, NY
Health score
67.2
Total assets
$40.3M
Answer first
TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA leads on financial health and profitability and lending quality; UTICA DISTRICT TELEPHONE EMPLOYEES leads on capitalization. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Financial health
TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA
Higher TFS health score
Capitalization
UTICA DISTRICT TELEPHONE EMPLOYEES
Higher comparable capital ratio
Profitability
TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA
Lower problem-loan measure
Same-source detail
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA | UTICA DISTRICT TELEPHONE EMPLOYEES |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 75.3/100Leads | 67.2/100 |
| Total assets | $38.1M | $40.3M |
| Total deposits / shares | $31.6M | $28.2M |
| Net worth ratio | 17.16% | 31.94%Leads |
| Return on assets | 1.33%Leads | 0.67% |
| Return on equity | 7.73%Leads |
TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA
1 branches
UTICA DISTRICT TELEPHONE EMPLOYEES
2 branches
Both institutions report branches in 1 state: NY.
TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA
Unavailable
UTICA DISTRICT TELEPHONE EMPLOYEES
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA
0 in TFS registry
UTICA DISTRICT TELEPHONE EMPLOYEES
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
| Quarter | TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA score | TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA ROA | UTICA DISTRICT TELEPHONE EMPLOYEES score | UTICA DISTRICT TELEPHONE EMPLOYEES ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-Q1 | 75.1/100 | 1.27% | 67.4/100 | 0.48% |
| 2026-Q2 | 75.3/100 | 1.33% | 67.2/100 | 0.67% |
Keep watching
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
Related comparisons
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.
| 2.09% |
| 60+ day delinquency | 0.00%Leads | 0.83% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.03%Leads | 0.34% |
| Efficiency ratio | — | — |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 40.49% | 55.04% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | — | — |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | — | — |
| Branches | 1 | 2 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |