Financial-condition comparison

Produce State Bank vs Red River State Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Produce State Bank

Hollandale, MN

C+

Health score

71.7

Total assets

$107.2M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Red River State Bank

Halstad, MN

C+

Health score

71.8

Total assets

$110.2M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Produce State Bank leads on lending quality and growth; Red River State Bank leads on capitalization and profitability. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Too close to call

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Red River State Bank

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Red River State Bank

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Produce State Bank

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Produce State Bank

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricProduce State BankRed River State Bank
TFS health score71.7/10071.8/100
Total assets$107.2M$110.2M
Total deposits / shares$94.6M$91.7M
Tier 1 capital ratio10.33%15.24%Leads
Return on assets1.31%2.18%Leads
Return on equity12.13%14.89%Leads
Non-performing loans1.26%Leads8.88%
Net charge-offs-0.15%-0.67%Leads
Efficiency ratio63.72%56.66%Leads
Loan-to-deposit ratio62.59%105.35%
Asset growth (YoY)0.38%Leads-5.14%
Deposit / share growth (YoY)0.30%Leads-6.89%
Branches42
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Produce State Bank

4 branches

Red River State Bank

2 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: MN.

CFPB complaint coverage

Produce State Bank

Unavailable

Red River State Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Produce State Bank

0 in TFS registry

Red River State Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterProduce State Bank scoreProduce State Bank ROARed River State Bank scoreRed River State Bank ROA
2024-Q3—1.81%—1.53%
2024-Q4—1.74%—0.86%
2025-Q1—1.55%—1.54%
2025-Q2—1.45%—1.33%
2025-Q3—1.36%—1.21%
2025-Q4—1.35%—0.56%
2026-Q173.8/1001.31%76.7/1002.10%
2026-Q271.7/1001.31%71.8/1002.18%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Produce State Bank
Red River State Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Produce State Bank with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.