Financial-condition comparison

One World Bank vs Victory Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

One World Bank

Dallas, TX

B-

Health score

73.3

Total assets

$290.1M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Victory Bank

Lubbock, TX

B

Health score

77.3

Total assets

$284.8M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

One World Bank leads on capitalization and lending quality; Victory Bank leads on financial health and profitability and growth. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Victory Bank

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

One World Bank

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Victory Bank

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

One World Bank

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Victory Bank

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricOne World BankVictory Bank
TFS health score73.3/10077.3/100Leads
Total assets$290.1M$284.8M
Total deposits / shares$245.0M$250.0M
Tier 1 capital ratio13.24%Leads12.11%
Return on assets-1.30%1.02%Leads
Return on equity-9.89%8.25%Leads
Non-performing loans0.00%Leads0.05%
Net charge-offs4.75%-0.00%Leads
Efficiency ratio69.19%59.45%Leads
Loan-to-deposit ratio90.14%62.93%
Asset growth (YoY)2.18%22.96%Leads
Deposit / share growth (YoY)4.07%24.70%Leads
Branches45
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

One World Bank

4 branches

Victory Bank

5 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: TX.

CFPB complaint coverage

One World Bank

Unavailable

Victory Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

One World Bank

0 in TFS registry

Victory Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterOne World Bank scoreOne World Bank ROAVictory Bank scoreVictory Bank ROA
2024-Q3—1.82%—0.24%
2024-Q4—1.73%—0.33%
2025-Q1—1.08%—0.35%
2025-Q2—1.19%—0.44%
2025-Q3—1.25%—0.58%
2025-Q4—1.16%—0.76%
2026-Q169.9/100-1.62%69.7/1000.90%
2026-Q273.3/100-1.30%77.3/1001.02%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

One World Bank
Victory Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare One World Bank with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.