This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Bank
Seneca, SC
Health score
83.0
Total assets
$679.4M
Bank
Charleston, SC
Health score
86.9
Total assets
$571.2M
Answer first
Oconee Federal Savings and Loan Association leads on capitalization and growth; The Bank of South Carolina leads on financial health and profitability and lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Financial health
The Bank of South Carolina
Higher TFS health score
Capitalization
Oconee Federal Savings and Loan Association
Higher comparable capital ratio
Profitability
The Bank of South Carolina
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
The Bank of South Carolina
Lower problem-loan measure
Growth
Oconee Federal Savings and Loan Association
Higher year-over-year asset growth
Same-source detail
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | Oconee Federal Savings and Loan Association | The Bank of South Carolina |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 83.0/100 | 86.9/100Leads |
| Total assets | $679.4M | $571.2M |
| Total deposits / shares | $571.2M | $497.3M |
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.55%Leads | 11.76% |
| Return on assets | 0.76% | 1.56%Leads |
| Return on equity | 6.18% | 14.81% |
Oconee Federal Savings and Loan Association
8 branches
The Bank of South Carolina
6 branches
Both institutions report branches in 1 state: SC.
Oconee Federal Savings and Loan Association
Unavailable
The Bank of South Carolina
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
Oconee Federal Savings and Loan Association
0 in TFS registry
The Bank of South Carolina
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Oconee Federal Savings and Loan Association score | Oconee Federal Savings and Loan Association ROA | The Bank of South Carolina score | The Bank of South Carolina ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-Q3 | — | 1.34% | — | 1.08% |
| 2024-Q4 | — | 1.16% | — | 1.14% |
| 2025-Q1 | — | 0.63% | — | 1.32% |
| 2025-Q2 | — | 0.76% | — | 1.36% |
| 2025-Q3 | — | 0.78% | — | 1.42% |
| 2025-Q4 | — | 0.76% | — | 1.42% |
| 2026-Q1 | 81.5/100 |
Keep watching
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
Related comparisons
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Arbitrary comparison pairs are available dynamically but remain noindex unless curated for data completeness and user value.
| Non-performing loans | 0.33% | 0.29%Leads |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00%Leads | 0.00% |
| Efficiency ratio | 61.11% | 56.15%Leads |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 86.78% | 73.41% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | 1.48%Leads | -1.56% |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | 4.19%Leads | -2.33% |
| Branches | 8 | 6 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |
| 0.70% |
| 86.8/100 |
| 1.45% |
| 2026-Q2 | 83.0/100 | 0.76% | 86.9/100 | 1.56% |