Financial-condition comparison

Members Trust Company vs Portrait Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Members Trust Company

Tampa, FL

C-

Health score

63.5

Total assets

$34.3M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Portrait Bank

Winter Park, FL

C-

Health score

61.5

Total assets

$44.7M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Members Trust Company leads on financial health and profitability; Portrait Bank leads on capitalization. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Members Trust Company

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Portrait Bank

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Members Trust Company

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Too close to call

Lower problem-loan measure

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricMembers Trust CompanyPortrait Bank
TFS health score63.5/100Leads61.5/100
Total assets$34.3M$44.7M
Total deposits / shares$500.0K$594.0K
Tier 1 capital ratio91.41%99.23%Leads
Return on assets-1.07%Leads-8.27%
Return on equity-1.28%Leads-8.90%
Non-performing loans0.00%0.00%
Net charge-offs0.00%0.00%
Efficiency ratio101.01%Leads8077.42%
Loan-to-deposit ratio0.00%0.00%
Asset growth (YoY)-6.15%—
Deposit / share growth (YoY)0.00%—
Branches40
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Members Trust Company

4 branches

Portrait Bank

0 branches

No shared branch states were found in the current TFS branch dataset.

CFPB complaint coverage

Members Trust Company

Unavailable

Portrait Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Members Trust Company

0 in TFS registry

Portrait Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterMembers Trust Company scoreMembers Trust Company ROAPortrait Bank scorePortrait Bank ROA
2024-Q3—-8.39%——
2024-Q4—-5.50%——
2025-Q1—-7.35%——
2025-Q2—-6.59%——
2025-Q3—-6.88%——
2025-Q4—-7.78%——
2026-Q164.7/100-0.84%——
2026-Q263.5/100-1.07%61.5/100-8.27%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Members Trust Company
Portrait Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Members Trust Company with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.