Financial-condition comparison

Lisle Savings Bank vs Pan American Bank & Trust

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Lisle Savings Bank

Lisle, IL

B+

Health score

82.2

Total assets

$544.5M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Pan American Bank & Trust

Melrose Park, IL

B-

Health score

73.4

Total assets

$536.1M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Lisle Savings Bank leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability; Pan American Bank & Trust leads on lending quality and growth. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Lisle Savings Bank

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Lisle Savings Bank

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Lisle Savings Bank

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Pan American Bank & Trust

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Pan American Bank & Trust

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricLisle Savings BankPan American Bank & Trust
TFS health score82.2/100Leads73.4/100
Total assets$544.5M$536.1M
Total deposits / shares$383.3M$474.7M
Tier 1 capital ratio26.10%Leads8.63%
Return on assets0.84%Leads0.83%
Return on equity3.42%9.78%Leads
Non-performing loans0.95%0.12%Leads
Net charge-offs-0.00%Leads0.00%
Efficiency ratio61.74%Leads70.29%
Loan-to-deposit ratio77.27%90.81%
Asset growth (YoY)-1.03%3.53%Leads
Deposit / share growth (YoY)-0.31%1.12%Leads
Branches45
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Lisle Savings Bank

4 branches

Pan American Bank & Trust

5 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: IL.

CFPB complaint coverage

Lisle Savings Bank

Unavailable

Pan American Bank & Trust

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Lisle Savings Bank

0 in TFS registry

Pan American Bank & Trust

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterLisle Savings Bank scoreLisle Savings Bank ROAPan American Bank & Trust scorePan American Bank & Trust ROA
2024-Q3—0.33%—1.01%
2024-Q4—0.32%—1.30%
2025-Q1—0.16%—0.63%
2025-Q2—0.28%—0.72%
2025-Q3—0.30%—0.78%
2025-Q4—0.29%—0.82%
2026-Q173.3/1000.33%73.9/1000.81%
2026-Q282.2/1000.84%73.4/1000.83%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Lisle Savings Bank
Pan American Bank & Trust

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Lisle Savings Bank with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.