Financial-condition comparison

City National Bank of Florida vs United Community Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

City National Bank of Florida

Miami, FL

B+

Health score

84.3

Total assets

$29.1B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

United Community Bank

Greenville, SC

B

Health score

80.1

Total assets

$29.0B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

City National Bank of Florida leads on financial health and capitalization and growth; United Community Bank leads on profitability and lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

City National Bank of Florida

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

City National Bank of Florida

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

United Community Bank

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

United Community Bank

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

City National Bank of Florida

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricCity National Bank of FloridaUnited Community Bank
TFS health score84.3/100Leads80.1/100
Total assets$29.1B$29.0B
Total deposits / shares$22.1B$24.1B
Tier 1 capital ratio11.38%Leads9.52%
Return on assets1.24%1.40%Leads
Return on equity11.86%Leads11.65%
Non-performing loans0.81%0.51%Leads
Net charge-offs0.09%Leads0.19%
Efficiency ratio43.19%Leads55.92%
Loan-to-deposit ratio92.20%82.32%
Asset growth (YoY)7.59%Leads3.37%
Deposit / share growth (YoY)2.68%Leads-1.29%
Branches31192
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

City National Bank of Florida

31 branches

United Community Bank

192 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: FL.

CFPB complaint coverage

City National Bank of Florida

Unavailable

United Community Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

City National Bank of Florida

0 in TFS registry

United Community Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterCity National Bank of Florida scoreCity National Bank of Florida ROAUnited Community Bank scoreUnited Community Bank ROA
2024-Q3—0.22%—0.92%
2024-Q4—0.34%—0.96%
2025-Q1—0.82%—1.08%
2025-Q2—0.90%—1.11%
2025-Q3—0.93%—1.17%
2025-Q4—0.96%—1.19%
2026-Q184.5/1001.19%78.4/1001.17%
2026-Q284.3/1001.24%80.1/1001.40%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

City National Bank of Florida
United Community Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare City National Bank of Florida with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.