This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Bank
Kilgore, TX
Health score
70.7
Total assets
$488.8M
Bank
Fort Worth, TX
Health score
55.9
Total assets
$501.8M
Answer first
Citizens Bank leads on financial health and profitability and lending quality and growth; Colonial Savings, F.A. leads on capitalization. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Financial health
Citizens Bank
Higher TFS health score
Capitalization
Colonial Savings, F.A.
Higher comparable capital ratio
Profitability
Citizens Bank
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
Citizens Bank
Lower problem-loan measure
Growth
Citizens Bank
Higher year-over-year asset growth
Same-source detail
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | Citizens Bank | Colonial Savings, F.A. |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 70.7/100Leads | 55.9/100 |
| Total assets | $488.8M | $501.8M |
| Total deposits / shares | $441.6M | $255.3M |
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 6.90% | 46.07%Leads |
| Return on assets | 0.79%Leads | -2.41% |
| Return on equity | 8.41%Leads |
Citizens Bank
12 branches
Colonial Savings, F.A.
7 branches
Both institutions report branches in 1 state: TX.
Citizens Bank
Unavailable
Colonial Savings, F.A.
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
Citizens Bank
0 in TFS registry
Colonial Savings, F.A.
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Citizens Bank score | Citizens Bank ROA | Colonial Savings, F.A. score | Colonial Savings, F.A. ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-Q3 | — | 0.61% | — | 0.16% |
| 2024-Q4 | — | 0.58% | — | 0.22% |
| 2025-Q1 | — | 0.42% | — | 0.36% |
| 2025-Q2 | — | 0.66% | — | 0.46% |
| 2025-Q3 | — | 0.77% | — | 1.42% |
| 2025-Q4 | — | 0.86% | — | 0.32% |
| 2026-Q1 | 68.9/100 | 0.84% |
Keep watching
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
Related comparisons
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Arbitrary comparison pairs are available dynamically but remain noindex unless curated for data completeness and user value.
| -5.67% |
| Non-performing loans | 0.02%Leads | 0.38% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.02%Leads | 0.00% |
| Efficiency ratio | 75.82%Leads | 192.24% |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 72.24% | 44.13% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | -0.06%Leads | -49.39% |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | 6.52%Leads | -58.07% |
| Branches | 12 | 7 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |
| 54.5/100 |
| -2.82% |
| 2026-Q2 | 70.7/100 | 0.79% | 55.9/100 | -2.41% |