Financial-condition comparison

Capitol National Bank vs Northern Interstate Bank, N. A.

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Capitol National Bank

Lansing, MI

A

Health score

88.9

Total assets

$209.3M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Northern Interstate Bank, N. A.

Norway, MI

C-

Health score

61.1

Total assets

$193.5M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Capitol National Bank leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability and growth; Northern Interstate Bank, N. A. leads on lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Capitol National Bank

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Capitol National Bank

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Capitol National Bank

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Northern Interstate Bank, N. A.

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Capitol National Bank

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricCapitol National BankNorthern Interstate Bank, N. A.
TFS health score88.9/100Leads61.1/100
Total assets$209.3M$193.5M
Total deposits / shares$162.1M$170.8M
Tier 1 capital ratio16.74%Leads9.36%
Return on assets1.79%Leads0.88%
Return on equity11.36%15.30%Leads
Non-performing loans1.49%0.75%Leads
Net charge-offs0.00%Leads0.02%
Efficiency ratio56.95%Leads67.48%
Loan-to-deposit ratio102.68%47.44%
Asset growth (YoY)10.63%Leads1.11%
Deposit / share growth (YoY)4.86%Leads-2.64%
Branches25
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Capitol National Bank

2 branches

Northern Interstate Bank, N. A.

5 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: MI.

CFPB complaint coverage

Capitol National Bank

Unavailable

Northern Interstate Bank, N. A.

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Capitol National Bank

0 in TFS registry

Northern Interstate Bank, N. A.

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterCapitol National Bank scoreCapitol National Bank ROANorthern Interstate Bank, N. A. scoreNorthern Interstate Bank, N. A. ROA
2024-Q3—2.14%—0.52%
2024-Q4—2.15%—0.54%
2025-Q1—1.87%—0.58%
2025-Q2—1.97%—0.68%
2025-Q3—1.98%—0.72%
2025-Q4—2.04%—0.70%
2026-Q193.5/1001.82%63.1/1000.83%
2026-Q288.9/1001.79%61.1/1000.88%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Capitol National Bank
Northern Interstate Bank, N. A.

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Capitol National Bank with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.