Financial-condition comparison

Byron Bank vs The Fisher National Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Byron Bank

Byron, IL

B

Health score

80.9

Total assets

$384.4M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

The Fisher National Bank

Fisher, IL

B

Health score

79.1

Total assets

$375.5M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Byron Bank leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability and lending quality; The Fisher National Bank leads on growth. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Byron Bank

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Byron Bank

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Byron Bank

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Byron Bank

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

The Fisher National Bank

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricByron BankThe Fisher National Bank
TFS health score80.9/100Leads79.1/100
Total assets$384.4M$375.5M
Total deposits / shares$338.1M$326.2M
Tier 1 capital ratio10.23%Leads9.00%
Return on assets2.07%Leads1.62%
Return on equity24.66%Leads17.79%
Non-performing loans1.28%Leads1.31%
Net charge-offs0.01%Leads0.08%
Efficiency ratio51.71%Leads59.22%
Loan-to-deposit ratio74.55%86.59%
Asset growth (YoY)3.69%8.06%Leads
Deposit / share growth (YoY)1.59%12.05%Leads
Branches46
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Byron Bank

4 branches

The Fisher National Bank

6 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: IL.

CFPB complaint coverage

Byron Bank

Unavailable

The Fisher National Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Byron Bank

0 in TFS registry

The Fisher National Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterByron Bank scoreByron Bank ROAThe Fisher National Bank scoreThe Fisher National Bank ROA
2024-Q3—0.45%—1.35%
2024-Q4—0.49%—1.28%
2025-Q1—0.85%—1.49%
2025-Q2—1.09%—1.57%
2025-Q3—1.13%—1.51%
2025-Q4—1.17%—1.58%
2026-Q179.0/1002.49%81.8/1001.63%
2026-Q280.9/1002.07%79.1/1001.62%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Byron Bank
The Fisher National Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Byron Bank with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.