Financial-condition comparison

Brannen Bank vs Helm Bank USA

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Brannen Bank

Inverness, FL

B-

Health score

75.3

Total assets

$1.0B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Helm Bank USA

Miami, FL

B

Health score

78.2

Total assets

$1.2B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Brannen Bank leads on profitability and lending quality; Helm Bank USA leads on financial health and capitalization and growth. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Helm Bank USA

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Helm Bank USA

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Brannen Bank

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Brannen Bank

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Helm Bank USA

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricBrannen BankHelm Bank USA
TFS health score75.3/10078.2/100Leads
Total assets$1.0B$1.2B
Total deposits / shares$991.9M$1.1B
Tier 1 capital ratio6.07%11.18%Leads
Return on assets1.97%Leads1.09%
Return on equity57.25%Leads11.76%
Non-performing loans0.45%Leads1.65%
Net charge-offs0.00%-0.00%Leads
Efficiency ratio47.26%Leads68.21%
Loan-to-deposit ratio53.70%61.37%
Asset growth (YoY)4.03%9.51%Leads
Deposit / share growth (YoY)3.37%9.73%Leads
Branches122
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Brannen Bank

12 branches

Helm Bank USA

2 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: FL.

CFPB complaint coverage

Brannen Bank

Unavailable

Helm Bank USA

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Brannen Bank

0 in TFS registry

Helm Bank USA

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterBrannen Bank scoreBrannen Bank ROAHelm Bank USA scoreHelm Bank USA ROA
2024-Q3—2.05%—0.76%
2024-Q4—2.02%—0.72%
2025-Q1—1.97%—0.86%
2025-Q2—2.00%—0.94%
2025-Q3—2.01%—0.98%
2025-Q4—2.02%—0.97%
2026-Q174.3/1001.92%78.7/1001.11%
2026-Q275.3/1001.97%78.2/1001.09%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Brannen Bank
Helm Bank USA

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Brannen Bank with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.