Financial-condition comparison

Bank of the Lowcountry vs The Bank of Clarendon

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Bank of the Lowcountry

Walterboro, SC

B-

Health score

75.1

Total assets

$430.2M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

The Bank of Clarendon

Manning, SC

B+

Health score

82.8

Total assets

$438.3M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Bank of the Lowcountry leads on growth; The Bank of Clarendon leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability and lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

The Bank of Clarendon

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

The Bank of Clarendon

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

The Bank of Clarendon

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

The Bank of Clarendon

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Bank of the Lowcountry

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricBank of the LowcountryThe Bank of Clarendon
TFS health score75.1/10082.8/100Leads
Total assets$430.2M$438.3M
Total deposits / shares$365.0M$387.0M
Tier 1 capital ratio9.25%11.66%Leads
Return on assets0.75%1.54%Leads
Return on equity10.42%14.66%Leads
Non-performing loans0.15%0.01%Leads
Net charge-offs0.00%Leads0.01%
Efficiency ratio74.95%52.99%Leads
Loan-to-deposit ratio88.58%57.27%
Asset growth (YoY)16.61%Leads4.05%
Deposit / share growth (YoY)5.61%Leads4.12%
Branches55
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Bank of the Lowcountry

5 branches

The Bank of Clarendon

5 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: SC.

CFPB complaint coverage

Bank of the Lowcountry

Unavailable

The Bank of Clarendon

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Bank of the Lowcountry

0 in TFS registry

The Bank of Clarendon

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterBank of the Lowcountry scoreBank of the Lowcountry ROAThe Bank of Clarendon scoreThe Bank of Clarendon ROA
2024-Q3—0.37%—1.18%
2024-Q4—0.39%—1.09%
2025-Q1—0.49%—1.33%
2025-Q2—0.64%—1.33%
2025-Q3—0.68%—1.34%
2025-Q4—0.71%—1.30%
2026-Q174.8/1000.77%79.3/1001.40%
2026-Q275.1/1000.75%82.8/1001.54%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Bank of the Lowcountry
The Bank of Clarendon

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Bank of the Lowcountry with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.