Financial-condition comparison

Bank of Greeleyville vs Blue Ridge Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Bank of Greeleyville

Greeleyville, SC

B+

Health score

83.9

Total assets

$160.1M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Blue Ridge Bank

Walhalla, SC

B-

Health score

76.5

Total assets

$199.4M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Bank of Greeleyville leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability and growth; Blue Ridge Bank leads on lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Bank of Greeleyville

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Bank of Greeleyville

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Bank of Greeleyville

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Blue Ridge Bank

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Bank of Greeleyville

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricBank of GreeleyvilleBlue Ridge Bank
TFS health score83.9/100Leads76.5/100
Total assets$160.1M$199.4M
Total deposits / shares$144.1M$181.8M
Tier 1 capital ratio10.62%Leads9.19%
Return on assets1.43%Leads0.54%
Return on equity14.48%Leads6.25%
Non-performing loans0.38%0.00%Leads
Net charge-offs0.41%0.00%Leads
Efficiency ratio66.51%Leads85.04%
Loan-to-deposit ratio75.75%73.66%
Asset growth (YoY)8.22%Leads3.25%
Deposit / share growth (YoY)11.36%Leads2.71%
Branches36
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Bank of Greeleyville

3 branches

Blue Ridge Bank

6 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: SC.

CFPB complaint coverage

Bank of Greeleyville

Unavailable

Blue Ridge Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Bank of Greeleyville

0 in TFS registry

Blue Ridge Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterBank of Greeleyville scoreBank of Greeleyville ROABlue Ridge Bank scoreBlue Ridge Bank ROA
2024-Q3—1.23%—0.84%
2024-Q4—1.31%—0.76%
2025-Q1—0.66%—0.57%
2025-Q2—1.03%—0.57%
2025-Q3—1.14%—0.63%
2025-Q4—1.10%—0.63%
2026-Q183.0/1001.39%72.8/1000.47%
2026-Q283.9/1001.43%76.5/1000.54%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Bank of Greeleyville
Blue Ridge Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Bank of Greeleyville with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.