Financial-condition comparison

Bank of Coushatta vs Patterson State Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Bank of Coushatta

Coushatta, LA

D-

Health score

52.2

Total assets

$317.1M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Patterson State Bank

Patterson, LA

C

Health score

67.3

Total assets

$330.7M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Bank of Coushatta leads on capitalization; Patterson State Bank leads on financial health and profitability and lending quality and growth. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Patterson State Bank

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Bank of Coushatta

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Patterson State Bank

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Patterson State Bank

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Patterson State Bank

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricBank of CoushattaPatterson State Bank
TFS health score52.2/10067.3/100Leads
Total assets$317.1M$330.7M
Total deposits / shares$244.7M$296.3M
Tier 1 capital ratio9.23%Leads8.92%
Return on assets0.50%0.61%Leads
Return on equity6.06%7.96%Leads
Non-performing loans6.52%1.78%Leads
Net charge-offs0.15%Leads0.36%
Efficiency ratio79.98%77.44%Leads
Loan-to-deposit ratio58.74%64.20%
Asset growth (YoY)3.62%7.64%Leads
Deposit / share growth (YoY)3.52%7.96%Leads
Branches33
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Bank of Coushatta

3 branches

Patterson State Bank

3 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: LA.

CFPB complaint coverage

Bank of Coushatta

Unavailable

Patterson State Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Bank of Coushatta

0 in TFS registry

Patterson State Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterBank of Coushatta scoreBank of Coushatta ROAPatterson State Bank scorePatterson State Bank ROA
2024-Q3—0.30%—0.39%
2024-Q4—0.31%—0.21%
2025-Q1—0.44%—0.30%
2025-Q2—0.46%—0.35%
2025-Q3—0.40%—0.35%
2025-Q4—0.42%—0.37%
2026-Q149.1/1000.49%70.7/1000.59%
2026-Q252.2/1000.50%67.3/1000.61%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Bank of Coushatta
Patterson State Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Bank of Coushatta with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.