Financial-condition comparison

Alerus Financial, National Association vs Bravera Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Alerus Financial, National Association

Grand Forks, ND

B

Health score

79.0

Total assets

$5.3B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Bravera Bank

Dickinson, ND

B

Health score

80.8

Total assets

$3.8B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Alerus Financial, National Association leads on profitability and lending quality; Bravera Bank leads on financial health and capitalization and growth. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Bravera Bank

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Bravera Bank

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Alerus Financial, National Association

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Alerus Financial, National Association

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Bravera Bank

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricAlerus Financial, National AssociationBravera Bank
TFS health score79.0/10080.8/100Leads
Total assets$5.3B$3.8B
Total deposits / shares$4.2B$3.3B
Tier 1 capital ratio9.26%9.73%Leads
Return on assets1.78%Leads1.37%
Return on equity16.35%Leads13.31%
Non-performing loans0.26%Leads0.90%
Net charge-offs0.47%-0.04%Leads
Efficiency ratio61.42%57.06%Leads
Loan-to-deposit ratio94.66%82.22%
Asset growth (YoY)-0.68%12.36%Leads
Deposit / share growth (YoY)-3.24%12.29%Leads
Branches2735
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Alerus Financial, National Association

27 branches

Bravera Bank

35 branches

Both institutions report branches in 2 states: MN, ND.

CFPB complaint coverage

Alerus Financial, National Association

Unavailable

Bravera Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Alerus Financial, National Association

0 in TFS registry

Bravera Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterAlerus Financial, National Association scoreAlerus Financial, National Association ROABravera Bank scoreBravera Bank ROA
2024-Q3—0.74%—1.15%
2024-Q4—0.67%—1.09%
2025-Q1—1.09%—1.14%
2025-Q2—1.37%—1.19%
2025-Q3—1.36%—1.20%
2025-Q4—0.42%—1.12%
2026-Q174.7/1001.81%78.7/1001.24%
2026-Q279.0/1001.78%80.8/1001.37%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Alerus Financial, National Association
Bravera Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Alerus Financial, National Association with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.