Financial-condition comparison

The First State Bank of Rosemount vs Valley Premier Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

The First State Bank of Rosemount

Rosemount, MN

D

Health score

55.1

Total assets

$146.1M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Valley Premier Bank

Hawley, MN

B

Health score

79.3

Total assets

$141.0M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

The First State Bank of Rosemount leads on growth; Valley Premier Bank leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability and lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Valley Premier Bank

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Valley Premier Bank

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Valley Premier Bank

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Valley Premier Bank

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

The First State Bank of Rosemount

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricThe First State Bank of RosemountValley Premier Bank
TFS health score55.1/10079.3/100Leads
Total assets$146.1M$141.0M
Total deposits / shares$138.4M$127.7M
Tier 1 capital ratio6.28%11.13%Leads
Return on assets0.33%1.44%Leads
Return on equity7.53%16.34%Leads
Non-performing loans2.88%0.00%Leads
Net charge-offs0.13%0.00%Leads
Efficiency ratio82.58%61.21%Leads
Loan-to-deposit ratio73.41%70.07%
Asset growth (YoY)1.16%Leads-2.97%
Deposit / share growth (YoY)2.87%Leads-4.67%
Branches22
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

The First State Bank of Rosemount

2 branches

Valley Premier Bank

2 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: MN.

CFPB complaint coverage

The First State Bank of Rosemount

Unavailable

Valley Premier Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

The First State Bank of Rosemount

0 in TFS registry

Valley Premier Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterThe First State Bank of Rosemount scoreThe First State Bank of Rosemount ROAValley Premier Bank scoreValley Premier Bank ROA
2024-Q3—0.27%—0.94%
2024-Q4—0.31%—0.90%
2025-Q1—0.09%—1.30%
2025-Q2—0.28%—1.24%
2025-Q3—0.32%—1.30%
2025-Q4—0.11%—1.27%
2026-Q153.5/1000.12%81.5/1001.49%
2026-Q255.1/1000.33%79.3/1001.44%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

The First State Bank of Rosemount
Valley Premier Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare The First State Bank of Rosemount with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.