Financial-condition comparison

Pee Dee Federal Savings Bank vs State Bank of Jeffers

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Pee Dee Federal Savings Bank

Marion, SC

C+

Health score

72.9

Total assets

$37.1M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

State Bank of Jeffers

Jeffers, MN

A

Health score

91.6

Total assets

$37.1M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Pee Dee Federal Savings Bank leads on capitalization and growth; State Bank of Jeffers leads on financial health and profitability and lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

State Bank of Jeffers

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Pee Dee Federal Savings Bank

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

State Bank of Jeffers

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

State Bank of Jeffers

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Pee Dee Federal Savings Bank

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricPee Dee Federal Savings BankState Bank of Jeffers
TFS health score72.9/10091.6/100Leads
Total assets$37.1M$37.1M
Total deposits / shares$29.4M$31.2M
Tier 1 capital ratio20.51%Leads14.06%
Return on assets0.99%2.24%Leads
Return on equity4.90%16.27%Leads
Non-performing loans0.27%0.00%Leads
Net charge-offs0.06%-0.82%Leads
Efficiency ratio76.18%38.71%Leads
Loan-to-deposit ratio44.22%60.35%
Asset growth (YoY)2.38%Leads-0.29%
Deposit / share growth (YoY)1.69%Leads-2.31%
Branches11
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Pee Dee Federal Savings Bank

1 branches

State Bank of Jeffers

1 branches

No shared branch states were found in the current TFS branch dataset.

CFPB complaint coverage

Pee Dee Federal Savings Bank

Unavailable

State Bank of Jeffers

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Pee Dee Federal Savings Bank

0 in TFS registry

State Bank of Jeffers

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterPee Dee Federal Savings Bank scorePee Dee Federal Savings Bank ROAState Bank of Jeffers scoreState Bank of Jeffers ROA
2024-Q3—1.06%—2.17%
2024-Q4—0.95%—1.82%
2025-Q1—1.03%—1.76%
2025-Q2—1.15%—1.71%
2025-Q3—1.18%—1.71%
2025-Q4—1.08%—1.58%
2026-Q173.7/1000.95%91.8/1002.52%
2026-Q272.9/1000.99%91.6/1002.24%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Pee Dee Federal Savings Bank
State Bank of Jeffers

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Pee Dee Federal Savings Bank with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.