Financial-condition comparison

Oklahoma State Bank vs Walters Bank and Trust Company

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Oklahoma State Bank

Buffalo, OK

B+

Health score

83.9

Total assets

$66.7M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Walters Bank and Trust Company

Walters, OK

A

Health score

92.3

Total assets

$70.3M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Oklahoma State Bank leads on profitability; Walters Bank and Trust Company leads on financial health and capitalization and lending quality and growth. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Walters Bank and Trust Company

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Walters Bank and Trust Company

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Oklahoma State Bank

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Walters Bank and Trust Company

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Walters Bank and Trust Company

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricOklahoma State BankWalters Bank and Trust Company
TFS health score83.9/10092.3/100Leads
Total assets$66.7M$70.3M
Total deposits / shares$59.5M$56.5M
Tier 1 capital ratio10.36%20.03%Leads
Return on assets2.88%Leads2.33%
Return on equity28.21%Leads12.04%
Non-performing loans1.47%0.06%Leads
Net charge-offs0.10%0.10%Leads
Efficiency ratio52.99%Leads53.18%
Loan-to-deposit ratio78.86%60.64%
Asset growth (YoY)1.23%6.66%Leads
Deposit / share growth (YoY)1.26%7.43%Leads
Branches21
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Oklahoma State Bank

2 branches

Walters Bank and Trust Company

1 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: OK.

CFPB complaint coverage

Oklahoma State Bank

Unavailable

Walters Bank and Trust Company

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Oklahoma State Bank

0 in TFS registry

Walters Bank and Trust Company

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterOklahoma State Bank scoreOklahoma State Bank ROAWalters Bank and Trust Company scoreWalters Bank and Trust Company ROA
2024-Q3—3.34%—1.81%
2024-Q4—3.31%—1.33%
2025-Q1—2.99%—1.48%
2025-Q2—3.14%—1.88%
2025-Q3—3.12%—1.90%
2025-Q4—3.09%—1.41%
2026-Q189.8/1002.84%95.3/1002.24%
2026-Q283.9/1002.88%92.3/1002.33%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Oklahoma State Bank
Walters Bank and Trust Company

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Oklahoma State Bank with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.