Financial-condition comparison

Northern Bank & Trust Company vs Northrim Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Northern Bank & Trust Company

Woburn, MA

A

Health score

88.4

Total assets

$3.4B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Northrim Bank

Anchorage, AK

B+

Health score

85.5

Total assets

$3.4B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Northern Bank & Trust Company leads on financial health and capitalization; Northrim Bank leads on profitability and lending quality and growth. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Northern Bank & Trust Company

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Northern Bank & Trust Company

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Northrim Bank

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Northrim Bank

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Northrim Bank

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricNorthern Bank & Trust CompanyNorthrim Bank
TFS health score88.4/100Leads85.5/100
Total assets$3.4B$3.4B
Total deposits / shares$2.8B$2.9B
Tier 1 capital ratio14.55%Leads10.26%
Return on assets1.90%1.98%Leads
Return on equity13.22%17.64%Leads
Non-performing loans2.07%0.89%Leads
Net charge-offs0.07%0.03%Leads
Efficiency ratio47.08%Leads57.16%
Loan-to-deposit ratio100.66%87.59%
Asset growth (YoY)4.97%5.06%Leads
Deposit / share growth (YoY)5.76%Leads4.19%
Branches1420
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Northern Bank & Trust Company

14 branches

Northrim Bank

20 branches

No shared branch states were found in the current TFS branch dataset.

CFPB complaint coverage

Northern Bank & Trust Company

Unavailable

Northrim Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Northern Bank & Trust Company

0 in TFS registry

Northrim Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterNorthern Bank & Trust Company scoreNorthern Bank & Trust Company ROANorthrim Bank scoreNorthrim Bank ROA
2024-Q3—1.60%—1.29%
2024-Q4—1.56%—1.31%
2025-Q1—1.63%—1.82%
2025-Q2—1.80%—1.71%
2025-Q3—1.75%—1.84%
2025-Q4—1.64%—1.80%
2026-Q185.7/1001.78%85.3/1001.91%
2026-Q288.4/1001.90%85.5/1001.98%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Northern Bank & Trust Company
Northrim Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Northern Bank & Trust Company with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.