Financial-condition comparison

Marion State Bank vs Spur Security Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Marion State Bank

Marion, TX

B-

Health score

76.5

Total assets

$142.0M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Spur Security Bank

Spur, TX

B+

Health score

84.3

Total assets

$140.6M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Marion State Bank leads on capitalization and profitability; Spur Security Bank leads on financial health and lending quality and growth. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Spur Security Bank

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Marion State Bank

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Marion State Bank

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Spur Security Bank

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Spur Security Bank

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricMarion State BankSpur Security Bank
TFS health score76.5/10084.3/100Leads
Total assets$142.0M$140.6M
Total deposits / shares$124.0M$127.3M
Tier 1 capital ratio14.65%Leads12.39%
Return on assets1.52%Leads0.75%
Return on equity12.97%Leads10.02%
Non-performing loans1.87%0.00%Leads
Net charge-offs0.27%0.00%Leads
Efficiency ratio56.71%Leads75.51%
Loan-to-deposit ratio47.35%74.23%
Asset growth (YoY)1.16%20.56%Leads
Deposit / share growth (YoY)-1.23%17.02%Leads
Branches12
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Marion State Bank

1 branches

Spur Security Bank

2 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: TX.

CFPB complaint coverage

Marion State Bank

Unavailable

Spur Security Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Marion State Bank

0 in TFS registry

Spur Security Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterMarion State Bank scoreMarion State Bank ROASpur Security Bank scoreSpur Security Bank ROA
2024-Q3—1.40%—0.01%
2024-Q4—1.45%—0.01%
2025-Q1—1.23%—0.09%
2025-Q2—1.37%—0.36%
2025-Q3—1.43%—0.42%
2025-Q4—1.57%—0.46%
2026-Q180.7/1001.50%78.2/1000.69%
2026-Q276.5/1001.52%84.3/1000.75%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Marion State Bank
Spur Security Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Marion State Bank with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.