This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Bank
Fairbanks, AK
Health score
70.7
Total assets
$635.2M
Answer first
Legends Bank leads on financial health and profitability and lending quality and growth; Mt. McKinley Bank leads on capitalization. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Financial health
Legends Bank
Higher TFS health score
Capitalization
Mt. McKinley Bank
Higher comparable capital ratio
Profitability
Legends Bank
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
Legends Bank
Lower problem-loan measure
Growth
Legends Bank
Higher year-over-year asset growth
Same-source detail
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | Legends Bank | Mt. McKinley Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 97.5/100Leads | 70.7/100 |
| Total assets | $635.5M | $635.2M |
| Total deposits / shares | $515.2M | $523.7M |
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 18.30% | 18.85%Leads |
| Return on assets | 2.25%Leads | 0.69% |
| Return on equity | 12.30%Leads |
Legends Bank
13 branches
Mt. McKinley Bank
5 branches
No shared branch states were found in the current TFS branch dataset.
Legends Bank
Unavailable
Mt. McKinley Bank
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
Legends Bank
0 in TFS registry
Mt. McKinley Bank
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Legends Bank score | Legends Bank ROA | Mt. McKinley Bank score | Mt. McKinley Bank ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-Q3 | — | 2.19% | — | 0.74% |
| 2024-Q4 | — | 2.26% | — | 0.74% |
| 2025-Q1 | — | 2.26% | — | 0.64% |
| 2025-Q2 | — | 2.34% | — | 0.76% |
| 2025-Q3 | — | 2.38% | — | 0.80% |
| 2025-Q4 | — | 2.40% | — | 0.84% |
| 2026-Q1 | 97.8/100 | 2.18% |
Keep watching
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
Related comparisons
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Arbitrary comparison pairs are available dynamically but remain noindex unless curated for data completeness and user value.
| 4.25% |
| Non-performing loans | 0.51%Leads | 1.18% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02%Leads | 0.03% |
| Efficiency ratio | 41.26%Leads | 78.44% |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 88.14% | 54.78% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | 7.32%Leads | 1.56% |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | 6.30%Leads | 0.88% |
| Branches | 13 | 5 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |
| 73.3/100 |
| 0.62% |
| 2026-Q2 | 97.5/100 | 2.25% | 70.7/100 | 0.69% |