Financial-condition comparison

LABOR MANAGEMENT vs PRECISION

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Credit union

LABOR MANAGEMENT

LEWISPORT, KY

C+

Health score

71.5

Total assets

$28.4M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Credit union

PRECISION

Keene, NH

D+

Health score

57.9

Total assets

$28.4M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

LABOR MANAGEMENT leads on financial health and capitalization and lending quality; PRECISION leads on profitability. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

LABOR MANAGEMENT

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

LABOR MANAGEMENT

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

PRECISION

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

LABOR MANAGEMENT

Lower problem-loan measure

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricLABOR MANAGEMENTPRECISION
TFS health score71.5/100Leads57.9/100
Total assets$28.4M$28.4M
Total deposits / shares$24.2M$24.9M
Net worth ratio14.76%Leads12.02%
Return on assets0.70%0.95%Leads
Return on equity4.78%7.94%Leads
60+ day delinquency1.88%Leads1.90%
Net charge-offs0.16%-0.05%Leads
Efficiency ratio——
Loan-to-deposit ratio74.34%44.31%
Asset growth (YoY)——
Deposit / share growth (YoY)——
Branches31
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

LABOR MANAGEMENT

3 branches

PRECISION

1 branches

No shared branch states were found in the current TFS branch dataset.

CFPB complaint coverage

LABOR MANAGEMENT

Unavailable

PRECISION

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

LABOR MANAGEMENT

0 in TFS registry

PRECISION

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterLABOR MANAGEMENT scoreLABOR MANAGEMENT ROAPRECISION scorePRECISION ROA
2026-Q181.6/1000.83%49.6/1000.78%
2026-Q271.5/1000.70%57.9/1000.95%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

LABOR MANAGEMENT
PRECISION

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare LABOR MANAGEMENT with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.