Financial-condition comparison

Key Community Bank vs State Bank of New Richland

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Key Community Bank

Inver Grove Heights, MN

C+

Health score

72.4

Total assets

$121.0M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

State Bank of New Richland

New Richland, MN

C+

Health score

69.5

Total assets

$124.2M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Key Community Bank leads on financial health and capitalization and lending quality and growth; State Bank of New Richland leads on profitability. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Key Community Bank

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Key Community Bank

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

State Bank of New Richland

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Key Community Bank

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Key Community Bank

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricKey Community BankState Bank of New Richland
TFS health score72.4/100Leads69.5/100
Total assets$121.0M$124.2M
Total deposits / shares$107.6M$81.0M
Tier 1 capital ratio10.66%Leads9.96%
Return on assets-0.11%1.97%Leads
Return on equity-1.13%20.87%Leads
Non-performing loans0.00%Leads0.29%
Net charge-offs1.36%0.00%Leads
Efficiency ratio67.76%40.28%Leads
Loan-to-deposit ratio95.78%134.85%
Asset growth (YoY)2.60%Leads0.20%
Deposit / share growth (YoY)9.95%Leads7.00%
Branches11
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Key Community Bank

1 branches

State Bank of New Richland

1 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: MN.

CFPB complaint coverage

Key Community Bank

Unavailable

State Bank of New Richland

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Key Community Bank

0 in TFS registry

State Bank of New Richland

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterKey Community Bank scoreKey Community Bank ROAState Bank of New Richland scoreState Bank of New Richland ROA
2024-Q3—0.93%—1.41%
2024-Q4—1.09%—1.28%
2025-Q1—1.25%—1.65%
2025-Q2—1.27%—1.55%
2025-Q3—1.30%—1.60%
2025-Q4—1.37%—1.55%
2026-Q165.3/100-1.89%65.2/1002.12%
2026-Q272.4/100-0.11%69.5/1001.97%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Key Community Bank
State Bank of New Richland

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Key Community Bank with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.