Financial-condition comparison

John Deere Financial, f.s.b. vs Johnson Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

John Deere Financial, f.s.b.

Middleton, WI

B+

Health score

81.7

Total assets

$4.9B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Johnson Bank

Racine, WI

B+

Health score

85.0

Total assets

$7.1B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

John Deere Financial, f.s.b. leads on capitalization and profitability and growth; Johnson Bank leads on financial health and lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Johnson Bank

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

John Deere Financial, f.s.b.

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

John Deere Financial, f.s.b.

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Johnson Bank

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

John Deere Financial, f.s.b.

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricJohn Deere Financial, f.s.b.Johnson Bank
TFS health score81.7/10085.0/100Leads
Total assets$4.9B$7.1B
Total deposits / shares$1.6B$5.6B
Tier 1 capital ratio19.36%Leads12.33%
Return on assets3.11%Leads1.30%
Return on equity15.03%Leads10.61%
Non-performing loans0.27%0.23%Leads
Net charge-offs2.36%-0.06%Leads
Efficiency ratio24.77%Leads62.23%
Loan-to-deposit ratio314.07%94.20%
Asset growth (YoY)8.66%Leads0.32%
Deposit / share growth (YoY)2.42%2.65%Leads
Branches132
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

John Deere Financial, f.s.b.

1 branches

Johnson Bank

32 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: WI.

CFPB complaint coverage

John Deere Financial, f.s.b.

Unavailable

Johnson Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

John Deere Financial, f.s.b.

0 in TFS registry

Johnson Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterJohn Deere Financial, f.s.b. scoreJohn Deere Financial, f.s.b. ROAJohnson Bank scoreJohnson Bank ROA
2024-Q3—3.97%—0.94%
2024-Q4—4.27%—0.90%
2025-Q1—4.72%—1.05%
2025-Q2—1.73%—0.91%
2025-Q3—3.27%—1.02%
2025-Q4—3.87%—1.07%
2026-Q183.3/1005.09%86.3/1001.24%
2026-Q281.7/1003.11%85.0/1001.30%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

John Deere Financial, f.s.b.
Johnson Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare John Deere Financial, f.s.b. with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.