Financial-condition comparison

HOLLYFRONTIER EMPLOYEE'S vs S E A

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Credit union

HOLLYFRONTIER EMPLOYEE'S

Bountiful, UT

C-

Health score

62.3

Total assets

$6.0M

View full profileData through 2026-Q1

Credit union

S E A

Richfield, UT

B+

Health score

82.2

Total assets

$7.2M

View full profileData through 2026-Q1

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

HOLLYFRONTIER EMPLOYEE'S leads on capitalization and profitability; S E A leads on financial health and lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

S E A

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

HOLLYFRONTIER EMPLOYEE'S

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

HOLLYFRONTIER EMPLOYEE'S

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

S E A

Lower problem-loan measure

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

Metric	HOLLYFRONTIER EMPLOYEE'S	S E A
TFS health score	62.3/100	82.2/100Leads
Total assets	$6.0M	$7.2M
Total deposits / shares	$4.0M	$5.8M
Net worth ratio	32.18%Leads	19.35%
Return on assets	0.93%Leads	0.89%
Return on equity	2.89%	4.58%

Branch and market overlap

HOLLYFRONTIER EMPLOYEE'S

2 branches

S E A

1 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: UT.

CFPB complaint coverage

HOLLYFRONTIER EMPLOYEE'S

Unavailable

S E A

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

HOLLYFRONTIER EMPLOYEE'S

0 in TFS registry

S E A

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

HOLLYFRONTIER EMPLOYEE'S

S E A

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

• No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
• Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
• Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare HOLLYFRONTIER EMPLOYEE'S with similar peers

GIBBONS AND REED EMPLOYEES

S E A

UINTAH

C U P

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Arbitrary comparison pairs are available dynamically but remain noindex unless curated for data completeness and user value.