Financial-condition comparison

HALE COUNTY TEACHERS vs VATAT

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Credit union

HALE COUNTY TEACHERS

Plainview, TX

D

Health score

56.5

Total assets

$11.1M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Credit union

VATAT

Austin, TX

A-

Health score

87.5

Total assets

$11.0M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

HALE COUNTY TEACHERS leads on lending quality; VATAT leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

VATAT

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

VATAT

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

VATAT

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

HALE COUNTY TEACHERS

Lower problem-loan measure

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricHALE COUNTY TEACHERSVATAT
TFS health score56.5/10087.5/100Leads
Total assets$11.1M$11.0M
Total deposits / shares$9.9M$8.7M
Net worth ratio10.36%17.90%Leads
Return on assets-0.15%1.33%Leads
Return on equity-1.50%7.42%Leads
60+ day delinquency0.00%Leads0.74%
Net charge-offs0.00%0.00%
Efficiency ratio——
Loan-to-deposit ratio53.78%78.04%
Asset growth (YoY)——
Deposit / share growth (YoY)——
Branches23
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

HALE COUNTY TEACHERS

2 branches

VATAT

3 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: TX.

CFPB complaint coverage

HALE COUNTY TEACHERS

Unavailable

VATAT

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

HALE COUNTY TEACHERS

0 in TFS registry

VATAT

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterHALE COUNTY TEACHERS scoreHALE COUNTY TEACHERS ROAVATAT scoreVATAT ROA
2026-Q157.4/100-0.21%70.2/1000.06%
2026-Q256.5/100-0.15%87.5/1001.33%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

HALE COUNTY TEACHERS
VATAT

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare HALE COUNTY TEACHERS with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.