Financial-condition comparison

FirsTier Bank vs Heartland Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

FirsTier Bank

Kimball, NE

C-

Health score

62.4

Total assets

$1.0B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Heartland Bank

Geneva, NE

A-

Health score

87.1

Total assets

$911.1M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

FirsTier Bank leads on capitalization and growth; Heartland Bank leads on financial health and profitability and lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Heartland Bank

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

FirsTier Bank

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Heartland Bank

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Heartland Bank

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

FirsTier Bank

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricFirsTier BankHeartland Bank
TFS health score62.4/10087.1/100Leads
Total assets$1.0B$911.1M
Total deposits / shares$883.2M$754.6M
Tier 1 capital ratio11.43%Leads10.25%
Return on assets0.77%2.01%Leads
Return on equity6.78%17.91%Leads
Non-performing loans4.51%0.13%Leads
Net charge-offs-0.01%Leads-0.00%
Efficiency ratio81.84%48.46%Leads
Loan-to-deposit ratio90.78%85.47%
Asset growth (YoY)0.13%Leads-0.91%
Deposit / share growth (YoY)-1.23%5.19%Leads
Branches1215
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

FirsTier Bank

12 branches

Heartland Bank

15 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: NE.

CFPB complaint coverage

FirsTier Bank

Unavailable

Heartland Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

FirsTier Bank

0 in TFS registry

Heartland Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterFirsTier Bank scoreFirsTier Bank ROAHeartland Bank scoreHeartland Bank ROA
2024-Q3—1.88%—1.35%
2024-Q4—1.85%—1.38%
2025-Q1—1.33%—1.58%
2025-Q2—1.24%—1.60%
2025-Q3—0.71%—1.65%
2025-Q4—0.34%—1.64%
2026-Q163.1/1000.75%86.6/1001.84%
2026-Q262.4/1000.77%87.1/1002.01%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

FirsTier Bank
Heartland Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare FirsTier Bank with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.