Financial-condition comparison

FIRST OHIO COMMUNITY vs HARVEST

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Credit union

FIRST OHIO COMMUNITY

North Canton, OH

D+

Health score

59.1

Total assets

$45.2M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Credit union

HARVEST

Heath, OH

C+

Health score

72.6

Total assets

$43.9M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

FIRST OHIO COMMUNITY leads on lending quality; HARVEST leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

HARVEST

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

HARVEST

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

HARVEST

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

FIRST OHIO COMMUNITY

Lower problem-loan measure

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricFIRST OHIO COMMUNITYHARVEST
TFS health score59.1/10072.6/100Leads
Total assets$45.2M$43.9M
Total deposits / shares$40.3M$38.1M
Net worth ratio10.68%12.80%Leads
Return on assets0.78%1.16%Leads
Return on equity7.26%9.04%Leads
60+ day delinquency0.00%Leads0.30%
Net charge-offs0.09%0.02%Leads
Efficiency ratio——
Loan-to-deposit ratio40.67%43.70%
Asset growth (YoY)——
Deposit / share growth (YoY)——
Branches24
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

FIRST OHIO COMMUNITY

2 branches

HARVEST

4 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: OH.

CFPB complaint coverage

FIRST OHIO COMMUNITY

Unavailable

HARVEST

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

FIRST OHIO COMMUNITY

0 in TFS registry

HARVEST

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterFIRST OHIO COMMUNITY scoreFIRST OHIO COMMUNITY ROAHARVEST scoreHARVEST ROA
2026-Q153.8/1000.59%76.2/1001.29%
2026-Q259.1/1000.78%72.6/1001.16%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

FIRST OHIO COMMUNITY
HARVEST

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare FIRST OHIO COMMUNITY with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.