Financial-condition comparison

Farmers & Merchants Bank & Trust vs Houghton State Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Farmers & Merchants Bank & Trust

Burlington, IA

B-

Health score

74.3

Total assets

$208.2M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Houghton State Bank

Red Oak, IA

A

Health score

88.3

Total assets

$204.8M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Farmers & Merchants Bank & Trust leads on lending quality; Houghton State Bank leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability and growth. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Houghton State Bank

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Houghton State Bank

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Houghton State Bank

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Farmers & Merchants Bank & Trust

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Houghton State Bank

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricFarmers & Merchants Bank & TrustHoughton State Bank
TFS health score74.3/10088.3/100Leads
Total assets$208.2M$204.8M
Total deposits / shares$187.0M$169.2M
Tier 1 capital ratio10.73%15.39%Leads
Return on assets0.91%1.56%Leads
Return on equity11.25%Leads9.50%
Non-performing loans1.66%Leads2.58%
Net charge-offs0.00%Leads0.03%
Efficiency ratio75.30%50.78%Leads
Loan-to-deposit ratio67.76%85.69%
Asset growth (YoY)-2.20%-0.60%Leads
Deposit / share growth (YoY)-1.04%Leads-1.84%
Branches45
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Farmers & Merchants Bank & Trust

4 branches

Houghton State Bank

5 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: IA.

CFPB complaint coverage

Farmers & Merchants Bank & Trust

Unavailable

Houghton State Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Farmers & Merchants Bank & Trust

0 in TFS registry

Houghton State Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterFarmers & Merchants Bank & Trust scoreFarmers & Merchants Bank & Trust ROAHoughton State Bank scoreHoughton State Bank ROA
2024-Q3—0.47%—1.30%
2024-Q4—0.38%—1.36%
2025-Q1—0.54%—1.49%
2025-Q2—0.52%—1.56%
2025-Q3—0.55%—1.55%
2025-Q4—0.59%—1.52%
2026-Q173.3/1000.99%84.5/1001.50%
2026-Q274.3/1000.91%88.3/1001.56%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Farmers & Merchants Bank & Trust
Houghton State Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Farmers & Merchants Bank & Trust with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.