Financial-condition comparison

Esquire Bank, National Association vs Interaudi Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Esquire Bank, National Association

Jericho, NY

A

Health score

89.2

Total assets

$2.5B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Interaudi Bank

New York, NY

B

Health score

79.4

Total assets

$2.7B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Esquire Bank, National Association leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability and lending quality and growth. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Esquire Bank, National Association

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Esquire Bank, National Association

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Esquire Bank, National Association

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Esquire Bank, National Association

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Esquire Bank, National Association

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricEsquire Bank, National AssociationInteraudi Bank
TFS health score89.2/100Leads79.4/100
Total assets$2.5B$2.7B
Total deposits / shares$2.2B$2.3B
Tier 1 capital ratio11.68%Leads10.02%
Return on assets2.34%Leads1.24%
Return on equity21.06%Leads12.32%
Non-performing loans0.27%Leads2.36%
Net charge-offs0.54%0.00%Leads
Efficiency ratio45.33%Leads53.77%
Loan-to-deposit ratio85.35%69.60%
Asset growth (YoY)22.32%Leads9.55%
Deposit / share growth (YoY)22.38%Leads9.97%
Branches22
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Esquire Bank, National Association

2 branches

Interaudi Bank

2 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: NY.

CFPB complaint coverage

Esquire Bank, National Association

Unavailable

Interaudi Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Esquire Bank, National Association

0 in TFS registry

Interaudi Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterEsquire Bank, National Association scoreEsquire Bank, National Association ROAInteraudi Bank scoreInteraudi Bank ROA
2024-Q3—2.74%—1.08%
2024-Q4—2.75%—1.15%
2025-Q1—2.62%—0.93%
2025-Q2—2.58%—1.05%
2025-Q3—2.69%—1.11%
2025-Q4—2.66%—1.12%
2026-Q187.5/1002.33%77.3/1001.17%
2026-Q289.2/1002.34%79.4/1001.24%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Esquire Bank, National Association
Interaudi Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Esquire Bank, National Association with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.