Financial-condition comparison

CTBC Bank Corp. (USA) vs SMBC MANUBANK

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

CTBC Bank Corp. (USA)

Los Angeles, CA

B+

Health score

82.5

Total assets

$5.9B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

SMBC MANUBANK

Los Angeles, CA

D+

Health score

60.5

Total assets

$6.6B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

CTBC Bank Corp. (USA) leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability and growth; SMBC MANUBANK leads on lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

CTBC Bank Corp. (USA)

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

CTBC Bank Corp. (USA)

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

CTBC Bank Corp. (USA)

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

SMBC MANUBANK

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

CTBC Bank Corp. (USA)

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricCTBC Bank Corp. (USA)SMBC MANUBANK
TFS health score82.5/100Leads60.5/100
Total assets$5.9B$6.6B
Total deposits / shares$5.0B$5.6B
Tier 1 capital ratio14.67%Leads9.63%
Return on assets0.87%Leads-3.56%
Return on equity6.33%Leads-32.51%
Non-performing loans1.55%0.30%Leads
Net charge-offs0.06%Leads3.42%
Efficiency ratio59.20%16.50%Leads
Loan-to-deposit ratio87.10%48.23%
Asset growth (YoY)10.35%Leads-2.42%
Deposit / share growth (YoY)10.59%Leads-0.08%
Branches208
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

CTBC Bank Corp. (USA)

20 branches

SMBC MANUBANK

8 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: CA.

CFPB complaint coverage

CTBC Bank Corp. (USA)

Unavailable

SMBC MANUBANK

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

CTBC Bank Corp. (USA)

0 in TFS registry

SMBC MANUBANK

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterCTBC Bank Corp. (USA) scoreCTBC Bank Corp. (USA) ROASMBC MANUBANK scoreSMBC MANUBANK ROA
2024-Q3—0.73%—-3.59%
2024-Q4—0.75%—-3.08%
2025-Q1—0.74%—-2.33%
2025-Q2—0.68%—-2.70%
2025-Q3—0.76%—-2.30%
2025-Q4—0.83%—-2.43%
2026-Q181.9/1000.93%55.5/100-6.85%
2026-Q282.5/1000.87%60.5/100-3.56%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

CTBC Bank Corp. (USA)
SMBC MANUBANK

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare CTBC Bank Corp. (USA) with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.