Financial-condition comparison

CRAYOLA LLC EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION vs U.F.C.W. LOCAL 23

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Credit union

CRAYOLA LLC EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION

EASTON, PA

D-

Health score

52.0

Total assets

$8.3M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Credit union

U.F.C.W. LOCAL 23

Canonsburg, PA

D-

Health score

52.1

Total assets

$8.4M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

CRAYOLA LLC EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION leads on capitalization and profitability and lending quality; U.F.C.W. LOCAL 23 leads on financial health. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

U.F.C.W. LOCAL 23

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

CRAYOLA LLC EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

CRAYOLA LLC EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

CRAYOLA LLC EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION

Lower problem-loan measure

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricCRAYOLA LLC EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNIONU.F.C.W. LOCAL 23
TFS health score52.0/10052.1/100Leads
Total assets$8.3M$8.4M
Total deposits / shares$6.5M$7.0M
Net worth ratio21.93%Leads16.39%
Return on assets0.31%Leads0.29%
Return on equity1.42%1.74%Leads
60+ day delinquency2.11%Leads3.68%
Net charge-offs0.00%Leads0.09%
Efficiency ratio——
Loan-to-deposit ratio42.20%53.54%
Asset growth (YoY)——
Deposit / share growth (YoY)——
Branches31
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

CRAYOLA LLC EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION

3 branches

U.F.C.W. LOCAL 23

1 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: PA.

CFPB complaint coverage

CRAYOLA LLC EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION

Unavailable

U.F.C.W. LOCAL 23

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

CRAYOLA LLC EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION

0 in TFS registry

U.F.C.W. LOCAL 23

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterCRAYOLA LLC EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION scoreCRAYOLA LLC EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION ROAU.F.C.W. LOCAL 23 scoreU.F.C.W. LOCAL 23 ROA
2026-Q151.4/100-0.05%51.7/1000.02%
2026-Q252.0/1000.31%52.1/1000.29%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

CRAYOLA LLC EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION
U.F.C.W. LOCAL 23

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare CRAYOLA LLC EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.