CLEVELAND-BRADLEY CTY TEACHER vs NASHVILLE POST OFFICE
This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Credit union
CLEVELAND-BRADLEY CTY TEACHER
CLEVELAND, TN
Health score
67.3
Total assets
$74.1M
Credit union
NASHVILLE POST OFFICE
NASHVILLE, TN
Health score
63.5
Total assets
$81.3M
Answer first
Different strengths, no blanket winner
CLEVELAND-BRADLEY CTY TEACHER leads on financial health and profitability and lending quality; NASHVILLE POST OFFICE leads on capitalization. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Where each institution leads
Financial health
CLEVELAND-BRADLEY CTY TEACHER
Higher TFS health score
Capitalization
NASHVILLE POST OFFICE
Higher comparable capital ratio
Profitability
CLEVELAND-BRADLEY CTY TEACHER
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
CLEVELAND-BRADLEY CTY TEACHER
Lower problem-loan measure
Same-source detail
Financial metrics
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | CLEVELAND-BRADLEY CTY TEACHER | NASHVILLE POST OFFICE |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 67.3/100Leads | 63.5/100 |
| Total assets | $74.1M | $81.3M |
| Total deposits / shares | $63.9M | $67.5M |
| Net worth ratio | 12.88% | 16.17%Leads |
| Return on assets | 1.05%Leads | 0.09% |
| Return on equity | 8.16%Leads | 0.54% |
| 60+ day delinquency | 0.51%Leads | 0.76% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.33%Leads | 1.98% |
| Efficiency ratio | — | — |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 37.49% | 59.87% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | — | — |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | — | — |
| Branches | 2 | 1 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |
Branch and market overlap
CLEVELAND-BRADLEY CTY TEACHER
2 branches
NASHVILLE POST OFFICE
1 branches
Both institutions report branches in 1 state: TN.
CFPB complaint coverage
CLEVELAND-BRADLEY CTY TEACHER
Unavailable
NASHVILLE POST OFFICE
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
Regulatory-action context
CLEVELAND-BRADLEY CTY TEACHER
0 in TFS registry
NASHVILLE POST OFFICE
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
Health and profitability trend
| Quarter | CLEVELAND-BRADLEY CTY TEACHER score | CLEVELAND-BRADLEY CTY TEACHER ROA | NASHVILLE POST OFFICE score | NASHVILLE POST OFFICE ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-Q1 | 62.1/100 | 0.88% | 61.2/100 | -1.09% |
| 2026-Q2 | 67.3/100 | 1.05% | 63.5/100 | 0.09% |
Keep watching
Watch either institution—or both
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
What this does not conclude
- • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
- • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
- • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.
Related comparisons
Compare CLEVELAND-BRADLEY CTY TEACHER with similar peers
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.