This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Bank
New Ulm, MN
Health score
72.9
Total assets
$596.0M
Bank
Winona, MN
Health score
74.7
Total assets
$583.7M
Answer first
Citizens Bank Minnesota leads on lending quality; WNB FINANCIAL, N.A. leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability and growth. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Financial health
WNB FINANCIAL, N.A.
Higher TFS health score
Capitalization
WNB FINANCIAL, N.A.
Higher comparable capital ratio
Profitability
WNB FINANCIAL, N.A.
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
Citizens Bank Minnesota
Lower problem-loan measure
Growth
WNB FINANCIAL, N.A.
Higher year-over-year asset growth
Same-source detail
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | Citizens Bank Minnesota | WNB FINANCIAL, N.A. |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 72.9/100 | 74.7/100Leads |
| Total assets | $596.0M | $583.7M |
| Total deposits / shares | $498.7M | $512.9M |
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 9.33% | 10.31%Leads |
| Return on assets | 0.85% | 1.00%Leads |
| Return on equity | 9.45% | 9.74% |
Citizens Bank Minnesota
6 branches
WNB FINANCIAL, N.A.
7 branches
Both institutions report branches in 1 state: MN.
Citizens Bank Minnesota
Unavailable
WNB FINANCIAL, N.A.
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
Citizens Bank Minnesota
0 in TFS registry
WNB FINANCIAL, N.A.
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Citizens Bank Minnesota score | Citizens Bank Minnesota ROA | WNB FINANCIAL, N.A. score | WNB FINANCIAL, N.A. ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-Q3 | — | 0.29% | — | 0.32% |
| 2024-Q4 | — | 0.30% | — | 0.40% |
| 2025-Q1 | — | 0.44% | — | 0.51% |
| 2025-Q2 | — | 0.38% | — | 0.59% |
| 2025-Q3 | — | 0.48% | — | 0.70% |
| 2025-Q4 | — | 0.50% | — | 0.76% |
| 2026-Q1 | 71.9/100 |
Keep watching
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
Related comparisons
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Arbitrary comparison pairs are available dynamically but remain noindex unless curated for data completeness and user value.
| Non-performing loans | 0.02%Leads | 0.08% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00% | -0.01%Leads |
| Efficiency ratio | 67.13%Leads | 67.82% |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 80.52% | 67.80% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | 2.71% | 4.83%Leads |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | 1.11% | 4.48%Leads |
| Branches | 6 | 7 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |
| 0.80% |
| 72.7/100 |
| 0.81% |
| 2026-Q2 | 72.9/100 | 0.85% | 74.7/100 | 1.00% |