Financial-condition comparison

Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company vs West Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company

Cedar Rapids, IA

A

Health score

91.0

Total assets

$2.9B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

West Bank

West Des Moines, IA

B+

Health score

82.5

Total assets

$4.0B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability and growth; West Bank leads on lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

West Bank

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricCedar Rapids Bank and Trust CompanyWest Bank
TFS health score91.0/100Leads82.5/100
Total assets$2.9B$4.0B
Total deposits / shares$2.1B$3.4B
Tier 1 capital ratio16.94%Leads10.79%
Return on assets2.72%Leads1.19%
Return on equity16.35%Leads13.02%
Non-performing loans0.54%0.00%Leads
Net charge-offs0.23%-0.00%Leads
Efficiency ratio40.44%Leads46.33%
Loan-to-deposit ratio95.79%87.11%
Asset growth (YoY)8.57%Leads-0.66%
Deposit / share growth (YoY)10.12%Leads-1.34%
Branches912
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company

9 branches

West Bank

12 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: IA.

CFPB complaint coverage

Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company

Unavailable

West Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company

0 in TFS registry

West Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterCedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company scoreCedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company ROAWest Bank scoreWest Bank ROA
2024-Q3—2.69%—0.72%
2024-Q4—2.80%—0.75%
2025-Q1—2.08%—0.92%
2025-Q2—2.20%—0.92%
2025-Q3—2.55%—0.97%
2025-Q4—2.83%—0.94%
2026-Q188.9/1002.43%78.7/1001.16%
2026-Q291.0/1002.72%82.5/1001.19%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company
West Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.