Financial-condition comparison

Bank of Utica vs The Adirondack Trust Company

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Bank of Utica

Utica, NY

B

Health score

80.1

Total assets

$1.5B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

The Adirondack Trust Company

Saratoga Springs, NY

B

Health score

77.3

Total assets

$1.7B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Bank of Utica leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability and growth; The Adirondack Trust Company leads on lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Bank of Utica

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Bank of Utica

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Bank of Utica

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

The Adirondack Trust Company

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Bank of Utica

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricBank of UticaThe Adirondack Trust Company
TFS health score80.1/100Leads77.3/100
Total assets$1.5B$1.7B
Total deposits / shares$1.1B$1.5B
Tier 1 capital ratio26.49%Leads10.49%
Return on assets4.80%Leads0.95%
Return on equity18.69%Leads8.56%
Non-performing loans0.59%0.44%Leads
Net charge-offs0.01%0.00%Leads
Efficiency ratio35.02%Leads73.01%
Loan-to-deposit ratio14.25%68.13%
Asset growth (YoY)6.68%Leads6.58%
Deposit / share growth (YoY)3.03%6.89%Leads
Branches113
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Bank of Utica

1 branches

The Adirondack Trust Company

13 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: NY.

CFPB complaint coverage

Bank of Utica

Unavailable

The Adirondack Trust Company

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Bank of Utica

0 in TFS registry

The Adirondack Trust Company

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterBank of Utica scoreBank of Utica ROAThe Adirondack Trust Company scoreThe Adirondack Trust Company ROA
2024-Q3—2.34%—0.77%
2024-Q4—1.50%—0.74%
2025-Q1—0.90%—0.59%
2025-Q2—1.59%—0.74%
2025-Q3—2.18%—0.85%
2025-Q4—2.31%—0.90%
2026-Q176.5/1003.06%73.1/1000.76%
2026-Q280.1/1004.80%77.3/1000.95%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Bank of Utica
The Adirondack Trust Company

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Bank of Utica with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.