Financial-condition comparison

Bank of Hazlehurst vs The Peoples Bank

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Bank of Hazlehurst

Hazlehurst, GA

B-

Health score

74.1

Total assets

$134.2M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

The Peoples Bank

Willacoochee, GA

D+

Health score

59.1

Total assets

$109.3M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Bank of Hazlehurst leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability and lending quality; The Peoples Bank leads on growth. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Bank of Hazlehurst

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Bank of Hazlehurst

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Bank of Hazlehurst

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Bank of Hazlehurst

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

The Peoples Bank

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricBank of HazlehurstThe Peoples Bank
TFS health score74.1/100Leads59.1/100
Total assets$134.2M$109.3M
Total deposits / shares$117.9M$95.2M
Tier 1 capital ratio14.56%Leads12.45%
Return on assets2.19%Leads0.71%
Return on equity19.22%Leads5.65%
Non-performing loans0.68%Leads0.89%
Net charge-offs-0.29%Leads0.03%
Efficiency ratio56.80%Leads79.80%
Loan-to-deposit ratio46.89%38.96%
Asset growth (YoY)-7.36%0.06%Leads
Deposit / share growth (YoY)-9.81%-0.44%Leads
Branches22
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Bank of Hazlehurst

2 branches

The Peoples Bank

2 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: GA.

CFPB complaint coverage

Bank of Hazlehurst

Unavailable

The Peoples Bank

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Bank of Hazlehurst

0 in TFS registry

The Peoples Bank

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterBank of Hazlehurst scoreBank of Hazlehurst ROAThe Peoples Bank scoreThe Peoples Bank ROA
2024-Q3—2.05%—0.62%
2024-Q4—2.08%—0.57%
2025-Q1—2.30%—0.59%
2025-Q2—2.26%—0.69%
2025-Q3—2.22%—0.81%
2025-Q4—2.24%—0.74%
2026-Q181.7/1002.09%58.6/1000.65%
2026-Q274.1/1002.19%59.1/1000.71%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Bank of Hazlehurst
The Peoples Bank

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Bank of Hazlehurst with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.