This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Bank
New York, NY
Health score
78.4
Total assets
$48.5B
Bank
Jacksonville, FL
Health score
77.3
Total assets
$46.7B
Answer first
Bank of China leads on financial health and growth; EverBank, National Association leads on profitability and lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Financial health
Bank of China
Higher TFS health score
Profitability
EverBank, National Association
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
EverBank, National Association
Lower problem-loan measure
Growth
Bank of China
Higher year-over-year asset growth
Same-source detail
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | Bank of China | EverBank, National Association |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 78.4/100Leads | 77.3/100 |
| Total assets | $48.5B | $46.7B |
| Total deposits / shares | $24.7B | $37.8B |
| Tier 1 capital ratio | — | 9.05% |
| Return on assets | 0.00% | 1.00%Leads |
| Return on equity | — | 11.14% |
Bank of China
1 branches
EverBank, National Association
43 branches
Both institutions report branches in 1 state: NY.
Bank of China
Unavailable
EverBank, National Association
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
Bank of China
0 in TFS registry
EverBank, National Association
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Bank of China score | Bank of China ROA | EverBank, National Association score | EverBank, National Association ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-Q3 | — | 0.00% | — | 0.62% |
| 2024-Q4 | — | 0.00% | — | 0.64% |
| 2025-Q1 | — | 0.00% | — | 0.72% |
| 2025-Q2 | — | 0.00% | — | 0.67% |
| 2025-Q3 | — | 0.00% | — | 0.75% |
| 2025-Q4 | — | 0.00% | — | 0.72% |
| 2026-Q1 | 80.3/100 |
Keep watching
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
Related comparisons
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Arbitrary comparison pairs are available dynamically but remain noindex unless curated for data completeness and user value.
| 1.63% |
| 1.42%Leads |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00%Leads | 0.02% |
| Efficiency ratio | 0.00%Leads | 51.67% |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 71.13% | 97.21% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | 6.44%Leads | 5.05% |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | 21.97%Leads | 8.60% |
| Branches | 1 | 43 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |
| 0.00% |
| 74.4/100 |
| 0.92% |
| 2026-Q2 | 78.4/100 | 0.00% | 77.3/100 | 1.00% |