Financial-condition comparison

Bangor Savings Bank vs Stockman Bank of Montana

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Bangor Savings Bank

Bangor, ME

C-

Health score

62.3

Total assets

$7.7B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

Stockman Bank of Montana

Miles City, MT

B+

Health score

85.6

Total assets

$7.7B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Bangor Savings Bank leads on lending quality; Stockman Bank of Montana leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability and growth. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

Stockman Bank of Montana

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Stockman Bank of Montana

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Stockman Bank of Montana

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

Bangor Savings Bank

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

Stockman Bank of Montana

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricBangor Savings BankStockman Bank of Montana
TFS health score62.3/10085.6/100Leads
Total assets$7.7B$7.7B
Total deposits / shares$5.7B$6.2B
Tier 1 capital ratio7.79%9.89%Leads
Return on assets0.37%1.91%Leads
Return on equity5.26%19.71%Leads
Non-performing loans0.47%Leads0.60%
Net charge-offs0.02%0.02%
Efficiency ratio83.03%50.38%Leads
Loan-to-deposit ratio90.91%82.88%
Asset growth (YoY)5.50%12.90%Leads
Deposit / share growth (YoY)-3.26%10.98%Leads
Branches7446
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

Bangor Savings Bank

74 branches

Stockman Bank of Montana

46 branches

No shared branch states were found in the current TFS branch dataset.

CFPB complaint coverage

Bangor Savings Bank

Unavailable

Stockman Bank of Montana

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

Bangor Savings Bank

0 in TFS registry

Stockman Bank of Montana

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterBangor Savings Bank scoreBangor Savings Bank ROAStockman Bank of Montana scoreStockman Bank of Montana ROA
2024-Q3—0.16%—1.38%
2024-Q4—0.17%—1.52%
2025-Q1—0.13%—1.68%
2025-Q2—0.11%—1.60%
2025-Q3—0.21%—1.76%
2025-Q4—0.39%—1.87%
2026-Q159.1/1000.25%85.3/1001.94%
2026-Q262.3/1000.37%85.6/1001.91%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Bangor Savings Bank
Stockman Bank of Montana

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Bangor Savings Bank with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.