This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Bank
Fort Leavenworth, KS
Health score
83.9
Total assets
$1.4B
Bank
Manhattan, KS
Health score
80.7
Total assets
$1.6B
Answer first
Armed Forces Bank, National Association leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability and growth; Landmark National Bank leads on lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Financial health
Armed Forces Bank, National Association
Higher TFS health score
Capitalization
Armed Forces Bank, National Association
Higher comparable capital ratio
Profitability
Armed Forces Bank, National Association
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
Landmark National Bank
Lower problem-loan measure
Growth
Armed Forces Bank, National Association
Higher year-over-year asset growth
Same-source detail
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | Armed Forces Bank, National Association | Landmark National Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 83.9/100Leads | 80.7/100 |
| Total assets | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Total deposits / shares | $1.2B | $1.3B |
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 13.92%Leads | 10.17% |
| Return on assets | 1.70%Leads | 1.33% |
| Return on equity | 13.41%Leads |
Armed Forces Bank, National Association
15 branches
Landmark National Bank
29 branches
Both institutions report branches in 1 state: KS.
Armed Forces Bank, National Association
Unavailable
Landmark National Bank
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
Armed Forces Bank, National Association
0 in TFS registry
Landmark National Bank
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Armed Forces Bank, National Association score | Armed Forces Bank, National Association ROA | Landmark National Bank score | Landmark National Bank ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-Q3 | — | 1.46% | — | 0.86% |
| 2024-Q4 | — | 1.43% | — | 0.87% |
| 2025-Q1 | — | 1.31% | — | 1.20% |
| 2025-Q2 | — | 1.33% | — | 1.16% |
| 2025-Q3 | — | 1.39% | — | 1.18% |
| 2025-Q4 | — | 1.46% | — | 1.20% |
| 2026-Q1 | 83.3/100 |
Keep watching
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
Related comparisons
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Arbitrary comparison pairs are available dynamically but remain noindex unless curated for data completeness and user value.
| 11.71% |
| Non-performing loans | 1.21% | 1.18%Leads |
| Net charge-offs | 0.39% | 0.14%Leads |
| Efficiency ratio | 65.56% | 61.14%Leads |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 59.33% | 83.38% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | -0.28%Leads | -1.14% |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | -0.29% | 2.47%Leads |
| Branches | 15 | 29 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |
| 1.74% |
| 80.3/100 |
| 1.31% |
| 2026-Q2 | 83.9/100 | 1.70% | 80.7/100 | 1.33% |