This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Bank
Cleveland, GA
Health score
71.3
Total assets
$72.6M
Bank
Edison, GA
Health score
76.8
Total assets
$83.9M
Answer first
Apex Banking Company of Georgia leads on capitalization and lending quality and growth; The Bank of Edison leads on financial health and profitability. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Financial health
The Bank of Edison
Higher TFS health score
Capitalization
Apex Banking Company of Georgia
Higher comparable capital ratio
Profitability
The Bank of Edison
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
Apex Banking Company of Georgia
Lower problem-loan measure
Growth
Apex Banking Company of Georgia
Higher year-over-year asset growth
Same-source detail
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | Apex Banking Company of Georgia | The Bank of Edison |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 71.3/100 | 76.8/100Leads |
| Total assets | $72.6M | $83.9M |
| Total deposits / shares | $66.5M | $78.6M |
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 9.70%Leads | 9.08% |
| Return on assets | 0.55% | 1.80%Leads |
| Return on equity | 6.98% | 31.70% |
Apex Banking Company of Georgia
2 branches
The Bank of Edison
1 branches
Both institutions report branches in 1 state: GA.
Apex Banking Company of Georgia
Unavailable
The Bank of Edison
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
Apex Banking Company of Georgia
0 in TFS registry
The Bank of Edison
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Apex Banking Company of Georgia score | Apex Banking Company of Georgia ROA | The Bank of Edison score | The Bank of Edison ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-Q3 | — | -0.61% | — | 1.34% |
| 2024-Q4 | — | -0.40% | — | 0.87% |
| 2025-Q1 | — | 0.09% | — | 1.85% |
| 2025-Q2 | — | 0.36% | — | 1.44% |
| 2025-Q3 | — | 0.39% | — | 1.22% |
| 2025-Q4 | — | 0.47% | — | 0.87% |
| 2026-Q1 | 68.7/100 |
Keep watching
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
Related comparisons
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Arbitrary comparison pairs are available dynamically but remain noindex unless curated for data completeness and user value.
| Non-performing loans | 0.03%Leads | 1.79% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00%Leads | 0.09% |
| Efficiency ratio | 84.55% | 68.66%Leads |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 67.32% | 63.10% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | 9.06%Leads | 4.34% |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | 8.74%Leads | 3.24% |
| Branches | 2 | 1 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |
| 0.51% |
| 72.6/100 |
| 1.27% |
| 2026-Q2 | 71.3/100 | 0.55% | 76.8/100 | 1.80% |