Financial-condition comparison

Ally Bank vs UBS Bank USA

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Bank

Ally Bank

Sandy, UT

B+

Health score

84.1

Total assets

$188.2B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Bank

UBS Bank USA

Salt Lake City, UT

B+

Health score

84.3

Total assets

$124.4B

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

Ally Bank leads on capitalization and profitability; UBS Bank USA leads on financial health and lending quality and growth. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

UBS Bank USA

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

Ally Bank

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

Ally Bank

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

UBS Bank USA

Lower problem-loan measure

Growth

UBS Bank USA

Higher year-over-year asset growth

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricAlly BankUBS Bank USA
TFS health score84.1/10084.3/100Leads
Total assets$188.2B$124.4B
Total deposits / shares$156.6B$109.3B
Tier 1 capital ratio9.60%Leads8.08%
Return on assets1.20%Leads1.09%
Return on equity14.53%Leads14.19%
Non-performing loans0.85%0.12%Leads
Net charge-offs1.15%-0.01%Leads
Efficiency ratio48.96%26.34%Leads
Loan-to-deposit ratio89.59%85.01%
Asset growth (YoY)5.69%8.87%Leads
Deposit / share growth (YoY)3.51%11.06%Leads
Branches11
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only38.438—

Branch and market overlap

Ally Bank

1 branches

UBS Bank USA

1 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: UT.

CFPB complaint coverage

Ally Bank

6,020 parent-company

UBS Bank USA

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Observed matched-date windows: Ally Bank: 2025-10-20–2026-10-19 · UBS Bank USA: mapping unavailable

Regulatory-action context

Ally Bank

0 in TFS registry

UBS Bank USA

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterAlly Bank scoreAlly Bank ROAUBS Bank USA scoreUBS Bank USA ROA
2024-Q3—1.01%—1.23%
2024-Q4—0.79%—1.23%
2025-Q1—0.03%—1.11%
2025-Q2—0.62%—1.14%
2025-Q3—0.83%—1.15%
2025-Q4—0.91%—1.13%
2026-Q181.4/1001.11%85.2/1001.04%
2026-Q284.1/1001.20%84.3/1001.09%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

Ally Bank
UBS Bank USA

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare Ally Bank with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.